Dan Hughes.
Founder of IXSOR. Twenty years in the UK, twenty-five in North Carolina. Ex-BBC. Ex-Apple. Lifelong technologist. And, most importantly: not an attorney. Writes about legal AI from the operational and infrastructure side, where the rules meet the machines.
Writing.
7 pieces · 2026AI Mining Judgments for Errors: The Post-Coney Island Map
Doctrinal essay on AI-assisted post-judgment review after the Supreme Court's January 2026 decision in Coney Island Auto Parts v. Burton. Includes the duty-to-mine question.
AI Vendor Diligence: Contract Clauses to Redline
Pattern catalogue of training-data, confidentiality, retention, indemnity, and termination clauses to negotiate with legal-AI vendors.
State Bar AI Opinions: A Comparative Tracker
Multi-state comparison of formal ethics opinions on lawyer use of generative AI (CA, FL, NY, NC, DC, MS).
Mata v. Avianca, Three Years On
Survey of post-Mata sanctions caselaw including Park v. Kim (2d Cir. 2024), the standing orders that emerged, and the verification standard.
ABA Formal Opinion 512: An Implementation Playbook
Rule-by-rule operational guide to ABA Op. 512 (Jul 2024), covering Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.3, 5.1, 5.3, 8.4.
NC State Bar 2024 FEO 1: What It Actually Requires
Brief-style reading of North Carolina's first AI ethics opinion, including its Rule 5.3 extension treating generative AI as a nonlawyer assistant.
AI for Lawyers: A Practical Map for 2026
Overview of the legal-AI category translated into specific tools, tasks, and risks for solo and small-firm practices.